The OMHA (Ontario Minor Hockey League) has stepped in to take control of the Simcoe Region Minor Hockey League (SRMHL) until certain issues can be resolved. SRMHL includes TNT, Beeton, Thornton, Innisfil, Bradford and Schomberg and some York Region based communities. According to the story in the New Tecumseth Free Press Online, the conflict appears to involve player rosters and webiste control.
"OMHA provided the SRMHL with player rosters so that there was a way to check and keep track of player movement, but is now refusing, citing privacy issues. Reportedly The OMHA also wanted control of the league's web site...." This should be an interesting story to follow. The full story is posted at http://www.madhunt.com/srmhl-board-resigns-20121029.html
Kids hockey - hockey book reviews, coaches, parents, tryouts, hockey classes, hockey camps, goalies, OMHA, GTHL, girls hockey
Showing posts with label Residency. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Residency. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 30, 2012
Wednesday, September 5, 2012
Question of the week
Hi - A question was asked this week:
Can a player from Caledon play for Brampton?
1.Just my opinion, but if the player is going to play house league, he should be able to play anywhere.
2.OMHA Right of Choice - measure the distance from your driveway to the designated centre - current and hoped for. Usually the Post Office is the centre, but not always. If the distances are within 8 kilometres of each other (for example it's 14 km to Brampton post office and 7 km to Caledon post office from the end of your drive - a difference of 7km - so less than 8km) over regularly travelled roads, then you have a Right of Choice - consult with the OMHA
3.At AAA level, yes but you need appropriate releases.
4.If you have an OHF grievance against your organization - you could try that.
5.If you have a goalie and Brampton has applied for Goalie Relief (stretching it a bit)
Good Luck - and check all the details first - these are just some ideas.
Can a player from Caledon play for Brampton?
1.Just my opinion, but if the player is going to play house league, he should be able to play anywhere.
2.OMHA Right of Choice - measure the distance from your driveway to the designated centre - current and hoped for. Usually the Post Office is the centre, but not always. If the distances are within 8 kilometres of each other (for example it's 14 km to Brampton post office and 7 km to Caledon post office from the end of your drive - a difference of 7km - so less than 8km) over regularly travelled roads, then you have a Right of Choice - consult with the OMHA
3.At AAA level, yes but you need appropriate releases.
4.If you have an OHF grievance against your organization - you could try that.
5.If you have a goalie and Brampton has applied for Goalie Relief (stretching it a bit)
Good Luck - and check all the details first - these are just some ideas.
Labels:
Brampton,
Caledon,
OMHA Player Movement,
Residency
Thursday, June 7, 2012
Peterborough Hockey Leagues to Merge
Peterborough Examiner - June 6, 2012
http://www.thepeterboroughexaminer.com/2012/06/06/peterborough-minor-hockey-association-unanimously-backs-merger-with-pcchl
"Led by a group of 34 parents, plus others via email, the vote was unanimous in favor of the Peterborough Minor Hockey Association amalgamating with the Peterborough Community Church Hockey League.
The tabulation came from 48 ballots and 31 emails for a final 79-0 count in favour, registered at the PMHA’s annual general meeting.
Parents with the PCCHL will get to vote at its annual general meeting at the Knights of Columbus Hall at 7 p.m. Wednesday."
Peterborugh Examiner - June 7, 2012
http://www.thepeterboroughexaminer.com/2012/06/07/pcchl-approves-merger-with-omha
"About 24 hours after Peterborough Minor Hockey Association (PMHA) parents voted unanimously in favour of amalgamating with the Peterborough Community Church Hockey League (PCCHL) at their annual general meeting at St. Alphonsus Hall, the latter followed suit in similar fashion at their AGM at the Knights of Columbus Hall Wednesday night."
http://www.thepeterboroughexaminer.com/2012/06/06/peterborough-minor-hockey-association-unanimously-backs-merger-with-pcchl
"Led by a group of 34 parents, plus others via email, the vote was unanimous in favor of the Peterborough Minor Hockey Association amalgamating with the Peterborough Community Church Hockey League.
The tabulation came from 48 ballots and 31 emails for a final 79-0 count in favour, registered at the PMHA’s annual general meeting.
Parents with the PCCHL will get to vote at its annual general meeting at the Knights of Columbus Hall at 7 p.m. Wednesday."
Peterborugh Examiner - June 7, 2012
http://www.thepeterboroughexaminer.com/2012/06/07/pcchl-approves-merger-with-omha
"About 24 hours after Peterborough Minor Hockey Association (PMHA) parents voted unanimously in favour of amalgamating with the Peterborough Community Church Hockey League (PCCHL) at their annual general meeting at St. Alphonsus Hall, the latter followed suit in similar fashion at their AGM at the Knights of Columbus Hall Wednesday night."
Labels:
OMHA Player Movement,
Peterborough,
Residency
Monday, May 7, 2012
Campbellford
Northumberland News
http://www.northumberlandnews.com/sports/article/1348975--campbellford-wins-appeal-to-remain-a-cc-centre
"Campbellford Minor Hockey Association has won its appeal and will remain at the CC level...The OMHA had been looking at reclassifying many centres for next season and Campbellford was facing being moved up to a B centre, where it would face teams that can draw from larger populations.
"The executive in consultation with many of our members felt it would be very difficult for a centre our size to be competitive at the B level so we decided to appeal the decision," Petherick said."
http://www.northumberlandnews.com/sports/article/1348975--campbellford-wins-appeal-to-remain-a-cc-centre
"Campbellford Minor Hockey Association has won its appeal and will remain at the CC level...The OMHA had been looking at reclassifying many centres for next season and Campbellford was facing being moved up to a B centre, where it would face teams that can draw from larger populations.
"The executive in consultation with many of our members felt it would be very difficult for a centre our size to be competitive at the B level so we decided to appeal the decision," Petherick said."
Labels:
Campbellford,
OMHA Player Movement,
Residency
Saturday, March 10, 2012
Mississauga Hockey League Import Policy
I pulled this from the Mississauga Hockey League site because it clarifies their import policy and a lot of viewers are interested in player movement. Like it or not, it's great when rules and boundaries are clear.
|
Labels:
Mississauga,
OMHA Player Movement,
Residency
Friday, March 2, 2012
Beeton and TNT Split
Here's another news story, this time from Simcoe.com http://www.simcoe.com/news/article/1308334--stingers-splitting-from-tnt about the split between New Tecumseth and Beeton. " A year after striking a deal that saw a true amalgamation of New Tecumseth’s minor hockey leagues, Beeton is ready to leave the partnership."
Labels:
Beeton,
Hockey News,
New Tecumseth,
OMHA Player Movement,
Residency,
Simcoe,
TNT
Thursday, March 1, 2012
No Port Hope and Cobourg Merger
"‘Five votes short’
By JEFF GARD Northumberland Today
Posted 14 days ago
PORT HOPE and COBOURG — There will be no amalgamation between Port Hope Minor Hockey and the Cobourg Community Hockey League in the foreseeable future."
Apparently the OMHA required 2/3 of each commnunity to vote in favour of a merger with 68% voting in favour in Cobourg and only 62.7% in Port Hope.
Labels:
Cobourg,
Hockey News,
OMHA Player Movement,
Port Hope,
Residency
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Beeton News?
Yesterday this article appeared from the Free Press Online:http://www.madhunt.com/baa-scrap-rep-deal-tnt-20120228.html
The Beeton Athletic Association (BAA) reportedly informed its members last night that it will be applying to the OMHA to reestablish itself as a rep hockey centre, ending, after one season, an arrangement with TNT Minor Hockey that opened the boundaries to kids in Beeton to play A or AA level in their town"...... "The deal forged between TNT and the BAA came after a year of contentious battling inside Beeton hockey". Things still seem to be up in the air!
"BAA tells members its reapplying to OMHA as rep hockey centre
Posted February 28, 2012The Beeton Athletic Association (BAA) reportedly informed its members last night that it will be applying to the OMHA to reestablish itself as a rep hockey centre, ending, after one season, an arrangement with TNT Minor Hockey that opened the boundaries to kids in Beeton to play A or AA level in their town"...... "The deal forged between TNT and the BAA came after a year of contentious battling inside Beeton hockey". Things still seem to be up in the air!
Labels:
Beeton,
Hockey News,
New Tecumseth,
OMHA Player Movement,
Residency,
TNT
Saturday, January 21, 2012
Bracebridge and Gravenhurst Minor Hockey
Bracebridge and Gravenhurst Minor Hockey Associations are both holding votes to look at merging the two hockey organization. The following article provides more detail:
http://www.cottagecountrynow.ca/news/article/1273788--minor-hockey-mergers-fairly-common-omha-says
"Gravenhurst Minor Hockey Association (GMHA) members will cast their ballots on the potential merger Jan. 12. Two-thirds of the vote must be in favour for the idea to pass. The Bracebridge association (BMHA) will then hold its vote Jan. 24 with an eye to creating a new single organizing body in April, well in advance of next season. If the idea is accepted by each association’s members, they will join a growing movement"
http://www.cottagecountrynow.ca/news/article/1273788--minor-hockey-mergers-fairly-common-omha-says
"Gravenhurst Minor Hockey Association (GMHA) members will cast their ballots on the potential merger Jan. 12. Two-thirds of the vote must be in favour for the idea to pass. The Bracebridge association (BMHA) will then hold its vote Jan. 24 with an eye to creating a new single organizing body in April, well in advance of next season. If the idea is accepted by each association’s members, they will join a growing movement"
Thursday, May 19, 2011
OMHA Boundaries
Each day visitors arrive at this blog looking for information regarding OMHA boundaries, player movement and residency rules. Should this be the best place to look? I think not! It should be the OMHA. Here's what the OMHA website tells us:
"What are the Residency Regulations for minor hockey?
The residency regulations govern the location your child plays competitive minor hockey in order to maintain a fair and competitive player development system. Residency regulations are defined by boundaries based on your home residence.
Recreational or House League players do not abide by Residency Regulations since they participate in competitive hockey.
Competitive or Rep players may appeal the residency regulation under certain circumstances. Other Rep players within the “Lake Ontario Region” have other regulations pertaining to tryouts.
What if our family has moved?
If your family moved from one OMHA association to another OMHA association since the last time your child [ren] participated in minor hockey, you are required to have an OMHA Residential Questionnaire completed and approved.
If your family moved from an area governed by another OHF Member Partner [GTHL, Alliance, OMHA, NOHA] since the last time your child [ren] participated in minor hockey you are required to have an OHF Residential Transfer completed and approved.
Each form is available to download at www.omha.net and be sure to ask your new association about this process when registering for the upcoming season. This will ensure that there are no delays in your child playing with their new association, especially if they will be participating in programming that is residentially restricted.
Team Officials should contact their local hockey association to ensure their records are up-to-date while Officials should contact the OMHA office."
This is at:
http://www.omha.net/flash.asp?page_id=413#FAQ15
There is a download booklet at http://www.omha.net/admin/downloads/11-OHF-OMHA.pdf which explains what Hockey Canada, The Ontario Hockey Federation and OMHA are. I thought that the following membership info was interesting:
"The following is the registered membership breakdown
for each OHF Member Partner based on the
2006-2007 insurance assessments.
Member Partners Registered players
Alliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,457
GTHL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,392
NOHA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10,893
OHA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2,944
OHL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 477
OMHA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111,193
OWHA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,326
TOTAL 221,682"
If you have registered for hockey already this year - you may be signing in through a Hockey Canada registration system. This registration system provided by Hockey Canada – keeps a record of your child in the location in which you are registering them. This is billed as a way to help your local organization be more administratively efficient and a few other benefits..... What it does is lock down player movement. If you try to move your child to another city to play hockey, there is a record of them in another location and you can’t register unless you go through some administrative work to transfer them.
“Hockey Canada Registry
Hockey Canada has recently developed a national database of all of our members. The database complies with our Privacy Policy while at the same time providing a sophisticated administrative tool. Access to this system is free with membership. Hockey Canada is only beginning to realize the full benefits of this system in the administration of hockey in this country and we are confident that our members will find this to be an invaluable resource. The ability to track players, suspensions, volunteer education, team statistics and the demographics of our members is an administrative advantage you simply cannot get anywhere else without paying a substantial fee."
This is also at http://www.omha.net/flash.asp?page_id=413#FAQ15
So once you have your child in this registry, you can't just sneak on over to the GTHL or another town without getting some sort of transfer. That's a whole other story....
Do you have any experiences with transferring? Please comment..
"What are the Residency Regulations for minor hockey?
The residency regulations govern the location your child plays competitive minor hockey in order to maintain a fair and competitive player development system. Residency regulations are defined by boundaries based on your home residence.
Recreational or House League players do not abide by Residency Regulations since they participate in competitive hockey.
Competitive or Rep players may appeal the residency regulation under certain circumstances. Other Rep players within the “Lake Ontario Region” have other regulations pertaining to tryouts.
What if our family has moved?
If your family moved from one OMHA association to another OMHA association since the last time your child [ren] participated in minor hockey, you are required to have an OMHA Residential Questionnaire completed and approved.
If your family moved from an area governed by another OHF Member Partner [GTHL, Alliance, OMHA, NOHA] since the last time your child [ren] participated in minor hockey you are required to have an OHF Residential Transfer completed and approved.
Each form is available to download at www.omha.net and be sure to ask your new association about this process when registering for the upcoming season. This will ensure that there are no delays in your child playing with their new association, especially if they will be participating in programming that is residentially restricted.
Team Officials should contact their local hockey association to ensure their records are up-to-date while Officials should contact the OMHA office."
This is at:
http://www.omha.net/flash.asp?page_id=413#FAQ15
There is a download booklet at http://www.omha.net/admin/downloads/11-OHF-OMHA.pdf which explains what Hockey Canada, The Ontario Hockey Federation and OMHA are. I thought that the following membership info was interesting:
"The following is the registered membership breakdown
for each OHF Member Partner based on the
2006-2007 insurance assessments.
Member Partners Registered players
Alliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,457
GTHL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,392
NOHA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10,893
OHA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2,944
OHL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 477
OMHA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111,193
OWHA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,326
TOTAL 221,682"
If you have registered for hockey already this year - you may be signing in through a Hockey Canada registration system. This registration system provided by Hockey Canada – keeps a record of your child in the location in which you are registering them. This is billed as a way to help your local organization be more administratively efficient and a few other benefits..... What it does is lock down player movement. If you try to move your child to another city to play hockey, there is a record of them in another location and you can’t register unless you go through some administrative work to transfer them.
“Hockey Canada Registry
Hockey Canada has recently developed a national database of all of our members. The database complies with our Privacy Policy while at the same time providing a sophisticated administrative tool. Access to this system is free with membership. Hockey Canada is only beginning to realize the full benefits of this system in the administration of hockey in this country and we are confident that our members will find this to be an invaluable resource. The ability to track players, suspensions, volunteer education, team statistics and the demographics of our members is an administrative advantage you simply cannot get anywhere else without paying a substantial fee."
This is also at http://www.omha.net/flash.asp?page_id=413#FAQ15
So once you have your child in this registry, you can't just sneak on over to the GTHL or another town without getting some sort of transfer. That's a whole other story....
Do you have any experiences with transferring? Please comment..
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
So What is the LOR Anyway?
This is from the Ontario Hockey Federation website http://www.ohf.on.ca/web_pages/region_policy.php
"History
The “Lake Ontario Region” (LOR) was formed as part of the Mediation Report adopted by the OHF Board of Directors in October of 1997 that addressed player eligibility issues in and around the Greater Toronto area.
Definition
The Minor Hockey geographic sub division comprised of the GTHL (Toronto, Mississauga and Vaughan) and the OMHA centres of Oakville, Brampton, Richmond Hill, Markham, Pickering and Ajax.
Regulations
The LOR Regulations for the 2009-2010 are the parameters by which players participate in the LOR."
The full regulations are at http://www.ohf.on.ca//web_doc/gen_pdf/lake_ontario_region.pdf
So are kids in the LOR more special than those in outlying towns?
"History
The “Lake Ontario Region” (LOR) was formed as part of the Mediation Report adopted by the OHF Board of Directors in October of 1997 that addressed player eligibility issues in and around the Greater Toronto area.
Definition
The Minor Hockey geographic sub division comprised of the GTHL (Toronto, Mississauga and Vaughan) and the OMHA centres of Oakville, Brampton, Richmond Hill, Markham, Pickering and Ajax.
Regulations
The LOR Regulations for the 2009-2010 are the parameters by which players participate in the LOR."
The full regulations are at http://www.ohf.on.ca//web_doc/gen_pdf/lake_ontario_region.pdf
So are kids in the LOR more special than those in outlying towns?
Thursday, January 6, 2011
OMHA Special Meeting - Player Movement
http://www.omha.net/admin/downloads/AGM11/Special%20General%20Meeting/SGM%20NOTICES%20OF%20MOTION_w_%20Cover_JAN%202011_v2.pdf
There is an OMHA meeting to vote on the player movement proposal Jan 23rd. The link is above.
Here is some of the proposed wording:
PROPOSEDWORDING
Current Methods of Player Movement:
a) The waiver system will continue for the AAA hockey program as per the current OMHA/Alliance regulations
b) The current LOR regulations remain in effect
c) Players from an association that is unable to roster a team in a season may move to the next nearest Centre per OMHA Regulation 3.5
Additional Method of Player Movement:
a) Movement to AA or A is only permitted for participants Minor Pee Wee age and above
Note: To be eligible the player is required to be the Minor Pee Wee age (11 years old) or older as at December 31 of the current playing season; OMHA Regulation 3.6 is NOT applicable.
b) Movement is only permitted to a higher level for players from A and below base category Centres
Note: There shall be NO lateral movement (i.e.: A to A, AA to AA)
c) Alliance seeded Centres will be categorized as AA for the purpose of player movement for OMHA players from BB and below
d) Maximum number of “Non Resident Players” (NRP) is three (3) per eligible team. Once a team has rostered an NRP then NO replacement NRP will be permitted.
e) Other than at a player’s Home Centre, the number of tryouts is limited to two (2) other categories. For his first opportunity, a player has the right to choose to tryout at AAA as per OMHA regulations, but this tryout is not mandatory. The second opportunity, a player must try out for a AA team at a AAA or AA base category Centre or an A team at an A base category Centre. A player’s tryout will only be permitted for the base category team in a Centre, any exceptions are listed below.`
OK, so there's a lot more in there - but it still doesn't help my kids. I'm appalled that this hasn't been passed earlier, so go ahead and pass it. But OMHA please understand that there are kids stuck playing hockey in OMHA towns filled with adult cliques that determine the pecking order in children's hockey. Sigh,,,,,,,,
The update is at http://hockeyzine.blogspot.com/2011/01/omha-approves-player-movement-proposal.html
There is an OMHA meeting to vote on the player movement proposal Jan 23rd. The link is above.
Here is some of the proposed wording:
PROPOSEDWORDING
Current Methods of Player Movement:
a) The waiver system will continue for the AAA hockey program as per the current OMHA/Alliance regulations
b) The current LOR regulations remain in effect
c) Players from an association that is unable to roster a team in a season may move to the next nearest Centre per OMHA Regulation 3.5
Additional Method of Player Movement:
a) Movement to AA or A is only permitted for participants Minor Pee Wee age and above
Note: To be eligible the player is required to be the Minor Pee Wee age (11 years old) or older as at December 31 of the current playing season; OMHA Regulation 3.6 is NOT applicable.
b) Movement is only permitted to a higher level for players from A and below base category Centres
Note: There shall be NO lateral movement (i.e.: A to A, AA to AA)
c) Alliance seeded Centres will be categorized as AA for the purpose of player movement for OMHA players from BB and below
d) Maximum number of “Non Resident Players” (NRP) is three (3) per eligible team. Once a team has rostered an NRP then NO replacement NRP will be permitted.
e) Other than at a player’s Home Centre, the number of tryouts is limited to two (2) other categories. For his first opportunity, a player has the right to choose to tryout at AAA as per OMHA regulations, but this tryout is not mandatory. The second opportunity, a player must try out for a AA team at a AAA or AA base category Centre or an A team at an A base category Centre. A player’s tryout will only be permitted for the base category team in a Centre, any exceptions are listed below.`
OK, so there's a lot more in there - but it still doesn't help my kids. I'm appalled that this hasn't been passed earlier, so go ahead and pass it. But OMHA please understand that there are kids stuck playing hockey in OMHA towns filled with adult cliques that determine the pecking order in children's hockey. Sigh,,,,,,,,
The update is at http://hockeyzine.blogspot.com/2011/01/omha-approves-player-movement-proposal.html
Thursday, November 18, 2010
OMHA Movement
Back on this topic again - because so many people are trying to find out what's going on. There doesn't seem to be anything going on - just frustration. The argument has been raging on Network54 - here's the link to the thread: http://www.network54.com/Forum/644200/thread/1282014275/1290085277/Human+Rights+Case
and I agree - what is everybody afraid of with player movement?
There is apparently a Human Rights Case going on - so you can email this link or visit the website below:
minorhockeyhr@gmail.com (minor hockey human rights is what it stands for)
Website http://sites.google.com/site/minorhockeyhr/home
You can join a Facebook group or a Forum:
Facebook Group: Minor Hockey Human Rights
Forum: http://mhhr.forum-free.ca/
Here is their posting of Recent Events:
"Recent Events
Aug 27, 2010 - Toronto Star article published "Ontario Minor Hockey Association relaxes residency rules"
September 11, 2010 - OMHA to Allow Player Movement to A and AA
Feb 20, 2010 - We are have numerous emails requesting to join the fight and now have several regions and numerous families involved in the Human Rights Claim. The many stories coming in are a strong and resounding cry for help from all the parents that have been subjected to residency restrictions.
Feb 18, 2010 - Human Rights Claim provided to Mr. McCurdie in the spirit of cooperation by Minor Hockey Human Rights group.
Feb 18, 2010 - Human Rights Claim requested by Glen McCurdie - Senior Director, Insurance and Member services Hockey Canada to Minor Hockey Human Rights group.
Feb 17, 2010 - Toronto Star article published "Parents fight minor hockey's residency rules"
Feb 13, 2010 - Boys minor hockey Human Rights claim has been filed."
So not a lot of new info. There is also have a link to this Star article:
http://www.thestar.com/sports/gthl/article/766637--parents-fight-minor-hockey-s-residency-rules
So we're still stuck in the OMHA, and that's it for now. Refer back to my previous post: http://hockeyzine.blogspot.com/2010/10/omha-boundaries.html
and the Latest Update is at http://hockeyzine.blogspot.com/2011/01/omha-approves-player-movement-proposal.html
and I agree - what is everybody afraid of with player movement?
There is apparently a Human Rights Case going on - so you can email this link or visit the website below:
minorhockeyhr@gmail.com (minor hockey human rights is what it stands for)
Website http://sites.google.com/site/minorhockeyhr/home
You can join a Facebook group or a Forum:
Facebook Group: Minor Hockey Human Rights
Forum: http://mhhr.forum-free.ca/
Here is their posting of Recent Events:
"Recent Events
Aug 27, 2010 - Toronto Star article published "Ontario Minor Hockey Association relaxes residency rules"
September 11, 2010 - OMHA to Allow Player Movement to A and AA
Feb 20, 2010 - We are have numerous emails requesting to join the fight and now have several regions and numerous families involved in the Human Rights Claim. The many stories coming in are a strong and resounding cry for help from all the parents that have been subjected to residency restrictions.
Feb 18, 2010 - Human Rights Claim provided to Mr. McCurdie in the spirit of cooperation by Minor Hockey Human Rights group.
Feb 18, 2010 - Human Rights Claim requested by Glen McCurdie - Senior Director, Insurance and Member services Hockey Canada to Minor Hockey Human Rights group.
Feb 17, 2010 - Toronto Star article published "Parents fight minor hockey's residency rules"
Feb 13, 2010 - Boys minor hockey Human Rights claim has been filed."
So not a lot of new info. There is also have a link to this Star article:
http://www.thestar.com/sports/gthl/article/766637--parents-fight-minor-hockey-s-residency-rules
So we're still stuck in the OMHA, and that's it for now. Refer back to my previous post: http://hockeyzine.blogspot.com/2010/10/omha-boundaries.html
and the Latest Update is at http://hockeyzine.blogspot.com/2011/01/omha-approves-player-movement-proposal.html
Saturday, June 19, 2010
OMHA Movement
This is posted on Network 54 Network 54 Residency Changes
What I take from this is nothing really helps my OMHA players. If they can't move from AE or A to AA at their home level, sure they can get released from the AAA zone to move the the next zone, but only at AAA. They shouldn't and won't ever jump to AAA if they can't get experience playing at AA level due to local cliques. Meanwhile kids who live in the GTHL boundaries can play anywhere in the GTHL or in their home zone. More opportunity to develop.....
"OMHA Residency Changes
May 25 2010 at 10:56 PM
No score for this post Anonymous (no login)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MADE FOR ONTARIO MINOR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION
DISCUSSION PAPER
PLAYER MOVEMENT - REPRESENTATIVE LEVEL
METHODS OF MOVEMENT:
Continuation of current waiver system for the AAA hockey program as per the present
regulations?
Mechanism for players in an Association unable to field a team in any particular season:
Move to the next nearest centre per OMHA Regulation 3.5?
Movement below Peewee
No movement at Novice or Atom except in accordance with OMHA Regulation 3.5?
Other than at a player’s home centre, limitations on number of tryouts?
Limit to two (2) levels: AAA and one of either AA or A?
Movement
Permit vertical movement only to a higher classification?
Potential Examples:
1. players from a AA centre may try out for home centre and a AAA zone as
per current regulations
2. players from an A centre may try out for home centre, a AAA zone as per
the current regulations and the nearest OMHA AA centre to residence
3. player from a centre BB and below may tryout for home centre, a AAA zone
as per the current regulations and the nearest OMHA AA or A centre to
residence
LIMITATIONS
Limit the number of Imports?’
Limit the number of imports for AA and A teams to three (3)
TRYOUTS
No tryouts or on or off-ice activities may be conducted prior to the completion of OHF
Championships at the AAA, AA or A level (OHF Reg G1)
Mechanism for players attending tryouts at AA or A (AAA per OHF Reg)
Permission/tracking?
METHOD FOR TRYOUTS AT AA AND A
Number of opportunities/choices permitted in tryouts for an OMHA AA or A centre.
Should mirror method of movement
Player MUST try out at the nearest OMHA AA or A centre to his residence
Options if player is unsuccessful
Return to Home centre?
Scenarios for Association acceptance of players outside its defined catchment area?
Options available for players who would be impacted by this, mechanism to manage?
The lastest update is at http://hockeyzine.blogspot.com/2011/01/omha-approves-player-movement-proposal.html
What I take from this is nothing really helps my OMHA players. If they can't move from AE or A to AA at their home level, sure they can get released from the AAA zone to move the the next zone, but only at AAA. They shouldn't and won't ever jump to AAA if they can't get experience playing at AA level due to local cliques. Meanwhile kids who live in the GTHL boundaries can play anywhere in the GTHL or in their home zone. More opportunity to develop.....
"OMHA Residency Changes
May 25 2010 at 10:56 PM
No score for this post Anonymous (no login)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MADE FOR ONTARIO MINOR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION
DISCUSSION PAPER
PLAYER MOVEMENT - REPRESENTATIVE LEVEL
METHODS OF MOVEMENT:
Continuation of current waiver system for the AAA hockey program as per the present
regulations?
Mechanism for players in an Association unable to field a team in any particular season:
Move to the next nearest centre per OMHA Regulation 3.5?
Movement below Peewee
No movement at Novice or Atom except in accordance with OMHA Regulation 3.5?
Other than at a player’s home centre, limitations on number of tryouts?
Limit to two (2) levels: AAA and one of either AA or A?
Movement
Permit vertical movement only to a higher classification?
Potential Examples:
1. players from a AA centre may try out for home centre and a AAA zone as
per current regulations
2. players from an A centre may try out for home centre, a AAA zone as per
the current regulations and the nearest OMHA AA centre to residence
3. player from a centre BB and below may tryout for home centre, a AAA zone
as per the current regulations and the nearest OMHA AA or A centre to
residence
LIMITATIONS
Limit the number of Imports?’
Limit the number of imports for AA and A teams to three (3)
TRYOUTS
No tryouts or on or off-ice activities may be conducted prior to the completion of OHF
Championships at the AAA, AA or A level (OHF Reg G1)
Mechanism for players attending tryouts at AA or A (AAA per OHF Reg)
Permission/tracking?
METHOD FOR TRYOUTS AT AA AND A
Number of opportunities/choices permitted in tryouts for an OMHA AA or A centre.
Should mirror method of movement
Player MUST try out at the nearest OMHA AA or A centre to his residence
Options if player is unsuccessful
Return to Home centre?
Scenarios for Association acceptance of players outside its defined catchment area?
Options available for players who would be impacted by this, mechanism to manage?
The lastest update is at http://hockeyzine.blogspot.com/2011/01/omha-approves-player-movement-proposal.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)